<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LiveJournal&#8217;s Boob War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.blogebrity.com/2006/05/livejournals-boob-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.blogebrity.com/2006/05/livejournals-boob-war/</link>
	<description>Blogebrity is welcoming the explosion of the first generation of bloggers and their rise to media dominance.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://blog.blogebrity.com/2006/05/livejournals-boob-war/#comment-830</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 22:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blogebrity.com/2006/05/livejournals-boob-war/#comment-830</guid>
		<description>And the hackers said they were doing it to protest actions by LJ Abuse. Full circle.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the hackers said they were doing it to protest actions by LJ Abuse. Full circle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://blog.blogebrity.com/2006/05/livejournals-boob-war/#comment-829</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 12:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blogebrity.com/2006/05/livejournals-boob-war/#comment-829</guid>
		<description>First, LJ refuses to admit they have a security problem, then they unveil new security measures that only partially address the hacking issues users have been complaining about.

Now, they fail to recognise a censorship problem. I wonder what new move they'll announce next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, LJ refuses to admit they have a security problem, then they unveil new security measures that only partially address the hacking issues users have been complaining about.</p>
<p>Now, they fail to recognise a censorship problem. I wonder what new move they&#8217;ll announce next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kat</title>
		<link>http://blog.blogebrity.com/2006/05/livejournals-boob-war/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 06:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blogebrity.com/2006/05/livejournals-boob-war/#comment-828</guid>
		<description>So no matter how many LJ users are concerned about a particular issue, LiveJournal will not be swayed? That sounds like a recipe for poor customer service if ever there was one! This isn't the first time there's been a lot of negative attention on the abuse team on LiveJournal, but this time I think Six Apart would be wise to listen and start addressing some of the concerns their customers share with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So no matter how many LJ users are concerned about a particular issue, LiveJournal will not be swayed? That sounds like a recipe for poor customer service if ever there was one! This isn&#8217;t the first time there&#8217;s been a lot of negative attention on the abuse team on LiveJournal, but this time I think Six Apart would be wise to listen and start addressing some of the concerns their customers share with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LJAB</title>
		<link>http://blog.blogebrity.com/2006/05/livejournals-boob-war/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator>LJAB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 02:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blogebrity.com/2006/05/livejournals-boob-war/#comment-827</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Are we the only ones that find LiveJournal's efforts to shun the power of consumer involvement just a tad ironic?&lt;/i&gt;

No, not at all! LiveJournal users have been becoming increasingly unhappy with the way the abuse team operates, and it looks as if this case might finally get enough complaints to Six Apart's ears for them to notice it. Let's hope they decide to take some action instead of joining in the "la la la".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Are we the only ones that find LiveJournal&#8217;s efforts to shun the power of consumer involvement just a tad ironic?</i></p>
<p>No, not at all! LiveJournal users have been becoming increasingly unhappy with the way the abuse team operates, and it looks as if this case might finally get enough complaints to Six Apart&#8217;s ears for them to notice it. Let&#8217;s hope they decide to take some action instead of joining in the &#8220;la la la&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.269 seconds -->
