<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IdolatorWatch: Is This One of Your Editors?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.blogebrity.com/2006/08/idolatorwatch-is-this-one-of-your-editors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.blogebrity.com/2006/08/idolatorwatch-is-this-one-of-your-editors/</link>
	<description>Blogebrity is welcoming the explosion of the first generation of bloggers and their rise to media dominance.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hampton</title>
		<link>http://blog.blogebrity.com/2006/08/idolatorwatch-is-this-one-of-your-editors/#comment-888</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hampton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 06:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blogebrity.com/2006/08/idolatorwatch-is-this-one-of-your-editors/#comment-888</guid>
		<description>Yes, but does your experience writing about monkeys with guns, Loch Ness Monster and Bigfoot sightings, and stupid Floridians really qualify you to write for Gawker?... hm, nevermind.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but does your experience writing about monkeys with guns, Loch Ness Monster and Bigfoot sightings, and stupid Floridians really qualify you to write for Gawker?&#8230; hm, nevermind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blog.blogebrity.com/2006/08/idolatorwatch-is-this-one-of-your-editors/#comment-887</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 01:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blogebrity.com/2006/08/idolatorwatch-is-this-one-of-your-editors/#comment-887</guid>
		<description>Personally I think they made a mistake in hiring her. Someone who has already written for Gawker (ie. me) would be a much better fit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I think they made a mistake in hiring her. Someone who has already written for Gawker (ie. me) would be a much better fit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.355 seconds -->
