<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amanda Makes Her ABC Debut Tomorrow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.blogebrity.com/2006/12/amanda-makes-her-abc-debut-tomorrow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.blogebrity.com/2006/12/amanda-makes-her-abc-debut-tomorrow/</link>
	<description>Blogebrity is welcoming the explosion of the first generation of bloggers and their rise to media dominance.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave T.</title>
		<link>http://blog.blogebrity.com/2006/12/amanda-makes-her-abc-debut-tomorrow/#comment-914</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blogebrity.com/2006/12/amanda-makes-her-abc-debut-tomorrow/#comment-914</guid>
		<description>What I don't get is she's an Internet celeb right? they paid all this money for a web video news brand. Yet their site is still the same old site it always was with a little button for Amanda's videos. Big whoop. Revamp that whole site and make her the feature. If I'm thinking general news site I'm going to go to on the web I hit cnn.com or maybe msnbc.com but never cbsnews.com or abcnews.com.  
So they got this unique content that no one else has and we're assuming they want to be new and hip, but they just want to "have" it and say they're doing new and different things. They don't actually do anything new or different. Bah. Oh and today my FJZ site (click my name if interested) got a wikipedia link and sentence under Jeff Zucker's entry. I'm stoked. I still don't think I get A-listed for that (I'm a very happy B lister) but still, I'm excited just the same. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I don&#8217;t get is she&#8217;s an Internet celeb right? they paid all this money for a web video news brand. Yet their site is still the same old site it always was with a little button for Amanda&#8217;s videos. Big whoop. Revamp that whole site and make her the feature. If I&#8217;m thinking general news site I&#8217;m going to go to on the web I hit cnn.com or maybe msnbc.com but never cbsnews.com or abcnews.com.<br />
So they got this unique content that no one else has and we&#8217;re assuming they want to be new and hip, but they just want to &#8220;have&#8221; it and say they&#8217;re doing new and different things. They don&#8217;t actually do anything new or different. Bah. Oh and today my FJZ site (click my name if interested) got a wikipedia link and sentence under Jeff Zucker&#8217;s entry. I&#8217;m stoked. I still don&#8217;t think I get A-listed for that (I&#8217;m a very happy B lister) but still, I&#8217;m excited just the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.357 seconds -->
