<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alex Blagg is the new Chuck Klosterman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.blogebrity.com/2007/04/alex-blagg-is-the-new-chuck-klosterman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.blogebrity.com/2007/04/alex-blagg-is-the-new-chuck-klosterman/</link>
	<description>Blogebrity is welcoming the explosion of the first generation of bloggers and their rise to media dominance.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 20:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rabble, Rabble.</title>
		<link>http://blog.blogebrity.com/2007/04/alex-blagg-is-the-new-chuck-klosterman/#comment-146316</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabble, Rabble.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 04:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blogebrity.com/2007/04/alex-blagg-is-the-new-chuck-klosterman/#comment-146316</guid>
		<description>Wow.

I know this an old blog, but wow.  I think the fact that noone's commented in almost a fully year shows how wrong you are.  And I'll admit a bias: We don't need a new Chuck Klosterman.  The one we have is just fine, thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.</p>
<p>I know this an old blog, but wow.  I think the fact that noone&#8217;s commented in almost a fully year shows how wrong you are.  And I&#8217;ll admit a bias: We don&#8217;t need a new Chuck Klosterman.  The one we have is just fine, thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.365 seconds -->
